Is Judaism inherently legalistic?

ben-ostrower-566321-unsplashIn the company of Jewish friends, I went way out into the wilderness where I could see my tradition through their eyes instead of my own. They taught me what messiah means to a Jew, which is quite different from what it means to most Christians. They taught me things about Second Temple Judaism and first-century life under Rome that enriched my understanding of Scripture. They gave me a whole new view of Paul. But they also showed me places where the followers of Jesus twisted the truth about Judaism or at least wrote things in such a way that their interpreters could. Once I understood that the gospel writers had not told me the whole truth about the Pharisees, I wondered what else they had not told me.

— Barbara Brown Taylor, Leaving Church

When I started learning Christian history as a Christian, many source materials painted a simple dichotomy: Jewish law = primitive and legalistic, Jesus Christ = freedom.

This dichotomy was enforced when I went to Israel for the first time and met my extended relatives, who didn’t do much to hide their judgment of my secular, Reform family. I got dirty looks for accidentally putting my meat dish in the dairy side of the sink, and for showing up to dinner with damp hair on Shabbat – evidence that I had taken a shower, which is forbidden.

Consequently, I believed this narrative about Judaism for many years, and praised God for opening my eyes to the truth, saving me from such a judgmental system.

It wasn’t until fairly recently that my interest in Judaism for its own sake was renewed, and I was a bit more selective in my research material this time (turns out, it’s quite helpful to read Jewish history from the perspective of Jewish scholars – who knew!).

That narrative of Judaism, as you can probably guess, was quite different.

In her book The Misunderstood Jew, New Testament scholar Amy-Jill Levine writes,

By suggesting that Jesus redeems his followers from an abusive legal system, Christians have a greater rationale both for ignoring the first part of their canon and for deemphasizing the point the Letter of James makes unequivocally, “Faith without works is dead” (2:26). By speaking of Jews as warlike, Christians can ignore the warlike aspects of their own canonical tradition, including statements made by Jesus himself, and so claim for him the peaceful high ground…A focus on Jewish purity and xenophobia allows Christians to claim leadership in multicultural efforts, even if that effort decides that one culture not worth celebrating is that of the Jews.

In all these cases, Jesus is made relevant either by projecting a negative stereotype of Judaism or by erasing Judaism entirely. The proclamation of the church can, and should, stand on its own; it does not require an artificial foil, an anti-Jewish bias, or an overstated distinction.

Once I truly absorbed this, I grew increasingly annoyed by mainstream Protestant teachers and pastors who kept pushing the “Judaism = legalism” narrative. But I also realized that they weren’t doing this to be intentionally anti-semitic; this is what they were taught in Sunday school or seminary, and it’s all they know, which just makes interfaith education and dialogue that much more important.

This isn’t to say that there weren’t any legalistic and xenophobic Jews in Jesus’ time – of course there were, and there still are today. But Jesus’ parables were hyperbolic and exaggerated on purpose. Church history, in many cases, has interpreted them to describe all Jews, and that simply isn’t true.

Regarding my own history, I wasn’t necessarily looking for “freedom from the law” when I converted (even though I did feel twinges of guilt for mixing meat and dairy from time to time). I was looking for a personal type of God who understood what it meant to have a literal human body. I did not “reject” Judaism for reasons that are historically inaccurate.

*

Like this post? Please support my writing with a donation via Patreon, leave a tip via Paypal, or check out my books on Amazon.

Stay in touch via Facebook and Twitter or subscribe to my monthly newsletter.

Advertisements

11 thoughts on “Is Judaism inherently legalistic?

  1. hannah out loud says:

    Hi beth

    Isn’t it ironic that America is built on the idea of a government of ” laws , not men”. In other words it’s ” legalistic” via the framework of the American constitution.. Britain by contrast has an un codified , but still written constitution, all over the shop over a thousand years, but both are clearly changeable, fungible and organic .

    In any case every society has laws and boundaries , constitutions and conventions (traditions). There’s no anarchist or true libertarian government on this planet and every civilisations has had a” legalistic ” society.

    The really irritating part is when my devout evangelical friends say I cherry pick ( because of my lesbianism) , yet they with a straight face say the old testament doesn’t apply to eating pork or shellfish ,circumcision or Jewish festivals. The ceremonial vs moral law is such a convenient cherry pick.

    In Judaism there’s a concept called kavvanah which means direction or purpose of heart. In other words Jews are supposed to follow Halacha in a sincere and not just legalistic fashion.

    Besides which when you read a page of the Talmud , you will see that the Chazal argued and argued with respect. Even the Talmud wasn’t the end of Jewish law as a modern day Talmud comes with commentary on the commentary, which doesn’t demonstrate a religion purely focused on legalistic dogmas.

    Shabbat Shalom.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Woebegone but Hopeful says:

    I fear all religions (and political creeds) have their ‘legalistic/dogmatic/fundamentalist’ communities which have forgotten the basics of their beliefs. For Christians to charge Jews as legalistic as if it were their sole preserve is laughable and hypocritical.
    Another fault which the European based Caucasian Christianity falls into is that the Bible has been translated over and over again, with the translators changing words and meanings as they understood them and the next translator doing the same thing.
    The New Testament reference to ‘Jews’ should be looked at in a political context as one group of Jewish people who were of a ultra-conservative ruling class and their followers… Once you read the books in this context the passages make more sense, since the disciples would still have thought of themselves as Jews.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. bobcabkings says:

    There is an irony in Christians criticizing Judaism as legalistic while at the same time (Perhaps not the same Christians?) call for a return to “Biblical Law”, which is exactly that body of law from which they day Jesus freed them. Its all very odd.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Bob Mueller says:

      Shh. You’re not supposed to notice that. Or at least not supposed to talk about in proper circles.

      And have you ever noticed that there are only certain aspects of “Biblical Law” that they want to enforce?

      Liked by 1 person

      • bobcabkings says:

        I suppose that if your allowed to cherry pick single sentences or paragraphs from disconnected bits of the book, then doing the same with the laws mentioned in it is OK too. It is a fairly safe bet that they are not much interested in the forgiveness of debts, freeing of slaves, and release of prisoners included in the celebration of the Jubilee year, for example.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s